Representatives of national, state and provincial governments from around the world are meeting in Paris in December at the United Nations Conference On Climate Change to attempt to come to an agreement on how to respond to the threat of catastrophic climate change. The Global Frackdown is an attempt to pressure these governments to take bold action to respond to the crisis we are facing and to move to a future in which sustainable energy systems and renewable energy sources replace fossil fuels.
The Global Frackdown will take place for the month of November. On the heels of the federal election, after having elected a new government, it is an opportunity to make clear that we want a ban on fracking (hydraulic fracturing). People around the world are being asked to organize a letter delivery the first week of November in the lead up to the Paris talks. Having over 700 organizations delivering the same message to decision makers around the world will send a very powerful message that we want a ban on fracking.
On behalf of the Hamilton chapter of the Council of Canadians we have signed on to the letter circulated by the organizers of theGlobal Frackdown. As of last count over 700 organizations across the world have signed on to this letter. To see the letter and the list of organizations that have signed on to it go to http://www.globalfrackdown.org/organizational-sign-on-letter.
We have addressed a slightly altered version of this letter (reproduced below) to the next Prime Minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau, and to the Premier of Ontario, Kathleen Wynne, asking their governments to declare an outright ban on fracking in Canada and in Ontario.
WHAT WE ARE ASKING YOU TO DO:
1. We would ask that you copy, sign and email the following letter to Trudeau and Wynne at firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com.
2. We also ask that you distribute this letter among your contacts as widely as possible.
3. We will also be collecting signatures on a petition version of this letter and sending these off to Premier Wynne at the end of November. Anyone who would like to collect signatures is encouraged to do so and to bring signed petitions to the chapter meeting on November 24th. The petition is attached.
Thank you on behalf of the Global Frackdown and the peoples and animals who inhabit planet earth. The letter follows:
To: The Prime Minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau and the Premier of Ontario, Kathleen Wynne
Subject: GLOBAL FRACKDOWN: BAN FRACKING NOW!
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org and email@example.com.
Dear Prime Minister Trudeau and Premier Wynne:
As the Conference of Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Paris (COP 21) approaches, we implore you to take bold action. This means not just setting emissions -reduction targets, but also by explicitly addressing the fundamental, science-based need to keep fossil fuels in the ground. Specifically, we call on you to reject hydraulic fracturing (fracking) and the use of acidization for oil and natural gas production and all of the related infrastructure. Instead you must take action to move aggressively to a 100% renewable energy future, which is necessary for remediating global warming and ensuring climate stability.
Last December, Governor Cuomo of New York finalized a review of the health impacts of fracking and moved to ban the practice in his state. This move followed the lead of countries such as France and Bulgaria, which have also banned fracking. Here in Canada, moratoriums or outright bans on fracking exist in Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Quebec. Such precaution is a response to mounting scientific evidence concerning the negative impacts of fracking, which include air and water pollution, public health problems, and earthquakes, not to mention the significant impacts that fracking, pipelines, and other fossil fuel infrastructure projects have on communities, the environment, and public health.
With respect to climate impacts, it is true that burning natural gas produces less carbon dioxide than does burning coal or oil. For this reason, fracked gas has been touted as having climate benefits and billed as a bridge fuel. However, the reality is that fracked gas is a bridge to climate chaos with no exit in sight. There are three basic reasons why.
First and foremost, increased natural gas use in the electricity sector does not just displace other fossil fuels, it also displaces cleaner solutions, such as solar, wind and energy efficiency. These solutions are paramount to meeting the climate challenge, yet fracking and an expanded energy infrastructure based on gas will continue to forestall their deployment.
Second, more natural gas, and thus more of the potent greenhouse gas methane, is leaking from well sites and pipelines than previously thought, and methane is a more powerful greenhouse gas than previously understood. As a consequence, the increase in methane emissions that comes with using natural gas instead of other fossil fuels offsets, and may outpace, the decrease in carbon dioxide used to justify switching to natural gas.
Third, setting aside the industry’s problems with methane leaks and looking at carbon dioxide alone, extracting and burning fracked gas threatens to release significantly more carbon dioxide than the world can afford. To avoid the irreversible effects of climate change, almost all of the natural gas that could be extracted by fracking must actually stay underground, unburned. That is the case even if aggressive global action is taken to wind down the use of oil and coal.
To illustrate this final point, it is widely accepted that no more than one-third of proven reserves of fossil fuels can be consumed prior to 2050 if the world is to have a better than 50-50 chance of avoiding 2 degrees Celsius of warming. But there are two ways in which this statistic understates the problem. First, it is only based on proven reserves — before accounting for most of the fracked gas, fracked oil, Arctic oil and tar sands oil now targeted. Almost all of this oil and gas must stay underground. Second, the estimate of “unburnable” proven reserves derives from dated climate science, and the 2-degree threshold is too permissive. Now, climate science is clear that surpassing even 1.5 degrees of warming will lead to unacceptable impacts, particularly in the Global South.
Put simply, we cannot afford to continue down an energy path that relies on fossil fuels if we are to maintain the stability of our climate and the health of the planet. Despite this fact, vested interests have succeeded in convincing many governments that fracking for shale gas is a harmless “bridge fuel” toward renewables. This is a dangerous and deeply flawed point of view.
The world is facing a climate crisis that has already brought devastating impacts that will only escalate to catastrophic levels without swift action. Fracking amounts to inaction, and it is anathema to developing sustainable energy systems available to all and premised on the efficient use of safe, abundant, affordable and renewable energy resources, subject to regional conditions and constraints.
At the Paris climate summit, it must be made clear that fracking for shale gas, tight gas, coalbed methane and tight oil, as well as other extreme fossil fuel extraction methods, are incompatible with climate stability. We implore you to support a ban on fracking and related processes, as provincial and national policy and toward international agreements, and to make explicit the need to maximize the amount of fossil fuels to be kept underground and unburned.
Your Name (required):
Location (City, Province and Country) (required):
Your Email (required):
Leave A Comment